<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/static/rss.xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
     xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
     version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Deeper Diligence</title>
<link>https://daypart.ai</link>
<atom:link href="https://pinecast.com/feed/deeper-dilligence" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<generator>Pinecast (https://pinecast.com)</generator>
<language>en-US</language><itunes:author>Daypart</itunes:author>
<description><![CDATA[Headlines move markets. Claims move businesses. We investigate both. Every episode breaks down the evidence behind the biggest stories in AI, advertising, ecommerce, and digital media, showing what can be verified, what can’t, and what everyone else missed.]]></description>
<itunes:owner>
<itunes:name>Daypart</itunes:name>
<itunes:email>marketing@daypart.ai</itunes:email>
</itunes:owner>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:image href="https://storage.pinecast.net/podcasts/covers/901f7d53-d704-47d5-8cb9-f7f77067f77e/Frame_43.jpg" />
<itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
<copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
<itunes:category text="Business"><itunes:category text="Management" /></itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="News Commentary" /></itunes:category>
<item><title>S1E6 - AI Ads, FTC Rules, and State Disclosure Laws: Staying Compliant with Synthetic Performers with Robert Freund</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinecast.com/guid/aafe21e6-bf56-4b49-b5e8-4f2db476ee15</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 14:45:15 -0000</pubDate>

<itunes:duration>00:28:18</itunes:duration>
<description><![CDATA[<h1>Episode Notes</h1>
<p>Links: </p>
<p><a href="https://newsletter.daypart.ai" rel="nofollow">newsletter.daypart.ai</a></p>
<p><a href="https://robertfreundlaw.com" rel="nofollow">robertfreundlaw.com</a></p>
<p>Robert Freund, an advertising and e-commerce lawyer, explains that most AI advertising risk comes from applying longstanding FTC Act Section 5 truth-in-advertising principles and endorsement rules rather than new federal AI-specific laws. </p>
<p>He highlights emerging state disclosure requirements for AI-created “synthetic performers,” including New York’s law (with AG-only enforcement and stated penalties of $1,000 for a first violation and $5,000 for subsequent violations), Hawaii’s similar law, and a pending California version. </p>
<p>He warns that disclosures don’t cure underlying deception, such as AI-generated before/after images or AI avatars giving “experience-based” testimonials, and notes deepfakes can trigger publicity rights and copyright issues. Responsibility generally remains with the advertiser and other parties who materially contribute, even when platforms generate creatives. </p>
<p>Recommended practices include identifying applicable risks, strengthening e-commerce terms of sale (including arbitration/class action waiver), negotiating indemnities/limits with vendors, and auditing content before scaling.</p>
<p>00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro</p>
<p>00:10 Rob’s Legal Background</p>
<p>01:19 AI Ads and Existing FTC Rules</p>
<p>04:20 State AI Disclosure Laws</p>
<p>08:27 Will Enforcement Expand</p>
<p>10:51 Who Gets Targeted</p>
<p>14:24 Creative Liability Checklist</p>
<p>18:36 Platform Tools and Shared Liability</p>
<p>21:33 Penalties and Damage Ranges</p>
<p>25:35 Compliance Best Practices</p>
<p>27:35 Where to Follow Rob</p>
<p>This podcast is powered by <a href="https://pinecast.com" rel="nofollow">Pinecast</a>.</p>]]></description>
<itunes:title>AI Ads, FTC Rules, and State Disclosure Laws: Staying Compliant with Synthetic Performers with Robert Freund</itunes:title>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<enclosure url="https://pinecast.com/listen/aafe21e6-bf56-4b49-b5e8-4f2db476ee15.mp3?source=rss&amp;ext=asset.mp3" length="27185450" type="audio/mpeg" />
<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
<itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
</item>
<item><title>S1E5 - Ads for AI Agents: How OpenAds.ai serves ads to AI Agents, Measures ROAS, &amp; What Perplexity’s Block Means</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinecast.com/guid/24d92b9e-c809-441f-96fc-36cf98c00af1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:49:36 -0000</pubDate>

<itunes:duration>00:31:35</itunes:duration>
<description><![CDATA[<h1>Episode Notes</h1>
<p>Bogdan Patynski and Digital Chadvertising hosts Deeper Diligence with Steven Liss, co-founder and CEO of <a href="http://OpenAds.ai" rel="nofollow">OpenAds.ai</a>, discussing “ads for agents,” where sponsored information is served to AI crawlers (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) and can surface in user answers.</p>
<p>Steven explains the market pull from brands wanting visibility in AI results, publishers’ monetization pressure as referral traffic drops, and why ads-to-agents could be an alternative to pay-per-scrape models. </p>
<p>We cover Perplexity’s stance on blocking such ads, likely responses from major labs, and publisher counter-leverage. Steven also shares experiments using CDN detection to serve different agent-specific content, emphasizing that success depends on retrieval/SEO and that performance measurement can be done via referral codes and cost-per-action pricing. We also discuss disclosure, standards, gray-hat manipulation risks, and why legacy DSPs struggle with purely contextual, non-identity targeting.</p>
<p>00:00 Show Premise</p>
<p>00:27 Meet Steven Liss</p>
<p>01:11 Ads For Agents</p>
<p>01:58 Why Now</p>
<p>03:20 Platform Pushback</p>
<p>04:29 Who Pays</p>
<p>05:15 Blocking And Evasion</p>
<p>06:29 Trust And Relevance</p>
<p>08:10 Experiment Setup</p>
<p>09:58 Prompt Sensitivity</p>
<p>11:53 Agent Autonomy</p>
<p>12:51 Measuring With Codes</p>
<p>13:34 B2B Opportunity</p>
<p>14:30 Programmatic Future</p>
<p>15:28 DSP Challenges</p>
<p>17:42 Pricing And CPA</p>
<p>18:36 Power Dynamics</p>
<p>22:46 Standards And Disclosure</p>
<p>23:48 Gray Hat Risks</p>
<p>25:37 DSPs And Budgets</p>
<p>28:46 Fraud Watchouts</p>
<p>30:15 Agent Internet Future</p>
<p>31:05 Where To Follow</p>
<p>This podcast is powered by <a href="https://pinecast.com" rel="nofollow">Pinecast</a>.</p>]]></description>
<itunes:title>Ads for AI Agents: How OpenAds.ai serves ads to AI Agents, Measures ROAS, &amp; What Perplexity’s Block Means</itunes:title>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<enclosure url="https://pinecast.com/listen/24d92b9e-c809-441f-96fc-36cf98c00af1.mp3?source=rss&amp;ext=asset.mp3" length="30337232" type="audio/mpeg" />
<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
<itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
</item>
<item><title>S1E4 - Understanding Attribution and Ad Fraud in 2026 with Dr. Fou</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinecast.com/guid/2ec1dfb6-afec-4010-90c7-d9b1fa624531</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 13:52:30 -0000</pubDate>

<itunes:duration>00:41:05</itunes:duration>
<description><![CDATA[<h1>Episode Notes</h1>
<p>Bogdan and co-host Digital Chatvertising interview Dr. Augustine Fou of Fou Analytics, a longtime digital marketer and ad-fraud researcher (ex‑McKinsey, American Express, Interpublic, Omnicom; PhD MIT), on why pixel attribution dominates because it’s easy and bundled with platforms, yet is oversimplistic and easily gamed. Fou explains better validation via holdout/“turn‑off” experiments (citing eBay’s paid-search test) to measure incremental impact using traffic and sales velocity, and recommends repeating on/off cycles for causal evidence. The discussion covers fraud seasonality spikes around budget deadlines (Q4, month/quarter ends) and in movie and political spending, how programmatic exchanges enabled fraud via fake sites and low-value apps, and why AI mainly lowers barriers rather than creating a new fraud wave. He details attribution gaming (e.g., footfall credit via mass device exposure) and advises reconciling platform-attributed conversions against real sales. Fou argues for evidence-based verification and transparent supporting data, contrasting legacy verification approaches, and offers common-sense ways to spot MFA sites.</p>
<p>00:00 Welcome and Introductions</p>
<p>01:27 Why Pixel Attribution Wins</p>
<p>04:25 Beyond Pixels Holdout Tests</p>
<p>07:01 Budget Pressure and Incrementality</p>
<p>08:57 Fraud Seasonality in Q4</p>
<p>11:51 Who Are the Bad Guys</p>
<p>16:24 Old Fraud Still Thrives</p>
<p>18:05 AI and Modern Fraud Tricks</p>
<p>20:01 How Attribution Gets Gamed</p>
<p>25:17 DIY Truth Checks for Nontechnical Teams</p>
<p>28:58 Turn Off Experiment Playbook</p>
<p>30:19 Verify Traffic and Vendor Claims</p>
<p>37:04 Spotting MFA Sites Fast</p>
<p>40:04 Wrap Up and Where to Reach Dr Fou</p>
<p>This podcast is powered by <a href="https://pinecast.com" rel="nofollow">Pinecast</a>.</p>]]></description>
<itunes:title>Understanding Attribution and Ad Fraud in 2026 with Dr. Fou</itunes:title>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<enclosure url="https://pinecast.com/listen/2ec1dfb6-afec-4010-90c7-d9b1fa624531.mp3?source=rss&amp;ext=asset.mp3" length="39456266" type="audio/mpeg" />
<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
<itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
</item>
<item><title>S1E3 - Decoding Attribution: A Deep Dive with Eric Tilbury</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinecast.com/guid/30c15dd9-6552-4c6b-98ad-14b5b8aae451</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 13:19:24 -0000</pubDate>

<itunes:duration>00:38:31</itunes:duration>
<description><![CDATA[<h1>Episode Notes</h1>
<p>In this episode of Deeper Diligence, Digital_Chadvertising and guest Eric Tilbury (VP of Programmatic &amp; Solutions Engineering at Inuvo) break down how ad attribution works and why it often fails. They explain user-ID and pixel-based attribution, including view-through vs click-through conversions, and discuss alternative approaches like media mix modeling and incrementality testing (e.g., geo lift). The conversation covers how privacy changes (like Safari blocking third-party trackers) and cross-device behavior make deterministic attribution fragile, while black-box platforms and incentives to hit low CPA/ROAS can distort results. They discuss common gaming and fraud tactics such as ID bridging, affiliate and click manipulation, and bottom-funnel retargeting that captures outsized credit, leading to budget misallocation. Practical advice includes defining measurement strategy first, testing vendors, building in-house measurement protocols, and using transparency and independent verification to evaluate ad tech.</p>
<p>00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro</p>
<p>01:51 What Attribution Means</p>
<p>03:27 View Through vs Click Through</p>
<p>04:16 Pixels and Tracking Basics</p>
<p>05:43 Other Attribution Methods</p>
<p>07:50 When Attribution Breaks</p>
<p>08:59 Incrementality and MMM</p>
<p>11:50 Why Deterministic Misleads</p>
<p>14:39 Easy Button Incentives</p>
<p>18:42 Privacy and ID Limits</p>
<p>22:17 ID Bridging and Fraud</p>
<p>28:08 Retargeting Reality Check</p>
<p>31:42 CFO and Investor Playbook</p>
<p>33:36 Transparency and Vetting</p>
<p>35:26 Future of Measurement</p>
<p>37:03 Wrap Up and Where to Find Eric</p>
<p>This podcast is powered by <a href="https://pinecast.com" rel="nofollow">Pinecast</a>.</p>]]></description>
<itunes:title>Decoding Attribution: A Deep Dive with Eric Tilbury</itunes:title>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<enclosure url="https://pinecast.com/listen/30c15dd9-6552-4c6b-98ad-14b5b8aae451.mp3?source=rss&amp;ext=asset.mp3" length="36990291" type="audio/mpeg" />
<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
</item>
<item><title>S1E2 - The Google's Gamble: Liability and Control in AI-Driven Advertising</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinecast.com/guid/309d8d24-fce8-4eb2-b5b1-5f667ad6eee4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:21:18 -0000</pubDate>

<itunes:duration>00:37:10</itunes:duration>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Jeromy, Bogdan and Lee discuss Google integrating AI more deeply into its ad campaign workflow while changing terms so advertisers are liable for AI-generated mistakes, arguing Google gains control without responsibility and predicting potential lawsuits and backlash, especially from professional advertisers. They explore why Google may be pushing this, including internal incentives to grow YouTube advertiser counts, and argue better measurement tools for incremental lift would drive adoption more sustainably. The conversation shifts to an Australian dock workers’ union demanding a 28-hour workweek as automation and AI increase productivity, questioning whether claimed gains are real and where they actually occur. They then cover a Texas Tribune investigation into Texas data centers using permitting tactics for turbines and diesel generators, noting emissions tied to gas plants serving data centers and debating hype versus reality of build-outs. Finally, they discuss Apple reportedly considering acquiring Prism ML to run a compressed 27B-parameter model locally on iPhones, emphasizing privacy and potential market shifts if Apple executes.</p>
<p>00:00 Welcome and Introductions</p>
<p>01:08 Google Ads AI Liability</p>
<p>06:27 Why Google Pushes YouTube</p>
<p>09:20 Measuring CTV Lift Properly</p>
<p>12:09 Australia 28 Hour Workweek</p>
<p>13:14 AI Productivity Reality Check</p>
<p>21:28 Texas Data Centers Emissions</p>
<p>27:59 North Korea Linux Tangent</p>
<p>30:42 Apple Local AI Comeback</p>
<p>37:00 Wrap Up and Subscribe</p>
<p>This podcast is powered by <a href="https://pinecast.com" rel="nofollow">Pinecast</a>.</p>]]></description>
<itunes:title>The Google's Gamble: Liability and Control in AI-Driven Advertising</itunes:title>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<enclosure url="https://pinecast.com/listen/309d8d24-fce8-4eb2-b5b1-5f667ad6eee4.mp3?source=rss&amp;ext=asset.mp3" length="35692471" type="audio/mpeg" />
<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
</item>
<item><title>S1E1 - Inside the Phia Affiliate Fraud Scandal: An Interview with Ben Edelman</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinecast.com/guid/8655dbad-cddd-46a6-85af-8c61de392e72</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 23:46:35 -0000</pubDate>

<itunes:duration>00:29:18</itunes:duration>
<description><![CDATA[<h1>Episode Notes</h1>
<p>Ben Edelman on Phia’s Alleged Forced Clicks: How Shopping Plugins Commit Affiliate Fraud</p>
<p>In a Deeper Diligence guest episode, ad-fraud researcher Ben Edelman discusses his investigation into Phia and the Bloomberg coverage alleging affiliate fraud through “forced clicks” and standdown-rule violations. Edelman explains the three-step affiliate marketing bargain (show link, user clicks, user buys) and how forced clicks skip the user click by using Phia’s iOS plugin to open an invisible tab that loads an affiliate link and closes it, positioning Phia as “last click” for commission—often costing merchants, and sometimes other affiliates like review publishers. He also describes standdown rules requiring shopping plugins to stay out of the way when another affiliate referred the user, and says Phia tracked competitor affiliate links yet did not stand down. Edelman questions Phia’s claim this behavior was a bug, cites past cases including eBay prosecutions and Honey-related evidence, and argues enforcement can deter fraud.</p>
<p>00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro</p>
<p>01:14 Ben Edelman Background</p>
<p>01:40 Why Phia Drew Attention</p>
<p>03:18 Cookie Stuffing vs Forced Clicks</p>
<p>04:14 Affiliate Marketing Basics</p>
<p>07:21 Networks and Incentives</p>
<p>09:40 Phia Forced Clicks Explained</p>
<p>12:34 Stand Down Rules Violations</p>
<p>14:31 Real World Harm Examples</p>
<p>17:09 Bug Claim and Intent</p>
<p>21:27 Past Major Fraud Cases</p>
<p>23:27 Honey Investigation Lessons</p>
<p>24:55 Stopping Fraud Systemically</p>
<p>27:02 Future Misconduct and Wrap Up</p>
<p>28:11 Closing Thanks and Contact</p>
<p>This podcast is powered by <a href="https://pinecast.com" rel="nofollow">Pinecast</a>.</p>]]></description>
<itunes:title>Inside the Phia Affiliate Fraud Scandal: An Interview with Ben Edelman</itunes:title>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<enclosure url="https://pinecast.com/listen/8655dbad-cddd-46a6-85af-8c61de392e72:396d1d5e-ff34-4326-88af-0f4cf3663a4b.mp3?source=rss&amp;ext=asset.mp3" length="31508441" type="audio/mpeg" />
<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
</item>
</channel>
<!-- generated in 0s 14329us -->
</rss>