<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/static/rss.xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
     xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
     version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Peerism</title>
<link>https://twitter.com/peerism1</link>
<atom:link href="https://pinecast.com/feed/peerism" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<generator>Pinecast (https://pinecast.com)</generator>
<language>en-US</language><itunes:author>Peerists </itunes:author>
<description><![CDATA[Stretching Research out into the Mainstream 
twitter.com/peerism1

]]></description>
<itunes:owner>
<itunes:name>Peerists </itunes:name>
<itunes:email>d.snow@live.com</itunes:email>
</itunes:owner>
<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:image href="https://storage.pinecast.net/podcasts/covers/54379ab7-81ca-4dcf-a765-8d12ea62a589/Upstart__2_.png" />
<itunes:type>serial</itunes:type>
<copyright>https://twitter.com/peerism1</copyright>
<itunes:subtitle>Stretching Research out into the Mainstream </itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:category text="Science"><itunes:category text="Life Sciences" />
<itunes:category text="Social Sciences" />
<itunes:category text="Natural Sciences" /></itunes:category>
<item><title>S1E1 - The Inequality of Controls</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinecast.com/guid/161170b8-d383-4c87-97da-cbaf596b6a76</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 01:48:01 -0000</pubDate>

<itunes:duration>00:31:56</itunes:duration>
<itunes:subtitle>The importance of investigating the biased nature of controls in contemporary statistical science, implications for race and gender topics.</itunes:subtitle>
<link>https://peerism.pinecast.co/episode/161170b8d3834c87/the-inequality-of-controls</link>
<description><![CDATA[<h1>Episode Notes</h1>

<p>tweet at <a href="https://twitter.com/peerism1" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/peerism1</a></p>

<ul>
<li><p>After all the study's control adjustments, including occupational sorting, the “unexplained” statistical wage gap is 5.4 cents to the male dollar in the US.</p></li>
<li><p>Are these controls, dressed up as choices, not in fact constraints? </p></li>
<li><p>One good way to understand why differences exists in occupational choice is cross-country studies. </p></li>
<li><p>What technological development has shown is that jobs that focus on things, i.e. engineering and software development have higher earnings potential due to the scalability of these technologies. </p></li>
<li><p>Could some removable burdens in maternity and child rearing effect occupational choice. </p></li>
</ul>
]]></description>
<itunes:title>The Inequality of Controls</itunes:title>
<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
<enclosure url="https://pinecast.com/listen/161170b8-d383-4c87-97da-cbaf596b6a76:e318fd93-eb8a-4806-af6c-1728a580aeb4.mp3?source=rss&amp;ext=asset.mp3" length="76675701" type="audio/mp3" />
<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
</item>
<item><title>S1E2 - Why Libra Should Not Exist</title>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://pinecast.com/guid/ef6dac60-6024-45ac-bd02-e6b3470fe2c6</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2020 06:46:35 -0000</pubDate>

<itunes:duration>00:11:22</itunes:duration>
<itunes:subtitle>Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP) 2.0</itunes:subtitle>
<link>https://peerism.pinecast.co/episode/ef6dac60602445ac/why-libra-should-not-exist</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The concept of BoP was first introduced by C.K. Pralahad in his book The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. The underlying idea behind the concept is simple: markets at the bottom of the social pyramid are a source of unexploited entrepreneurial and business opportunities.</p>

<p>Some of the brightest minds in the Bitcoin community have argued that Libra, a virtual currency managed by the Libra association – a Switzerland-based foundation initiated by Facebook – with no control from government authorities, will be beneficial to financial inclusion, to the world of cryptocurrencies, and more specifically to Bitcoin, by raising people’s awareness about central banks’ monopoly over monetary supply and giving the general public exposure to the world of cryptocurrencies.  </p>

<ul>
<li><strong>NARRATIVE</strong>
The role of business to meet social needs. In this context, fostering financial inclusion.</li>
<li><p><strong>RISK</strong> 
Adverse incorporation: inclusion in markets with no protection, no recourse.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>NARRATIVE</strong>
Business’ responsibility to replace the failing state. In this context, challenging central banks’ monopoly over monetary system.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>RISK</strong> 
A risk to public accountability, as businesses cannot be held accountable as easily as public sector institutions.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>NARRATIVE</strong>
Revamping the concept of poverty, more specifically increase the productivity and unleash the potential spirit of the poor.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>RISK</strong> 
Accumulation by dispossession: users of the Libra coin will generate value for the project, while granting the Libra association vast amount of data on their behaviour, daily habits, etc. Hence generating a new source of potential revenues for the Association and its members. The informal subjects then more legible become easier to govern. </p></li>
<li><p><strong>NARRATIVE</strong>
The creation of innovative (often technology-focused) business solution. In the Libra example, this involves the creation of a digital currency based on a permissioned blockchain.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>RISK</strong> 
Attack the symptoms of poverty without changing the underlying structure by hiding behind open source and technological idealism.  </p></li>
<li><p><strong>NARRATIVE</strong>
Legitimate initiative supported by renown academic and not-for-profit institutions.</p></li>
<li><strong>RISK</strong> 
Unconventional partnership with NGOs (e.g. Mercy Corps, Women’s World Banking) and supposedly independent institutions (e.g. University College London, MIT) to legitimise and hide the rent-seeking nature of the initiative.</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
<itunes:title>Why Libra Should Not Exist</itunes:title>
<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
<enclosure url="https://pinecast.com/listen/ef6dac60-6024-45ac-bd02-e6b3470fe2c6.mp3?source=rss&amp;ext=asset.mp3" length="27318901" type="audio/mpeg" />
<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
</item>
</channel>
<!-- generated in 0s 12296us -->
</rss>